While color may be the least critical aspect, it does have an impact and should be considered. In addition to thinking about the weight of your paper, you might also consider “acid-free” and similar qualities attributed to archival use. “cover” All three of these terms refer to heavier cardstock, so always make sure you’re looking at text weights. “index” is something different, as is 70 lb. “text” paper is perfect, I suggest that, if at all possible, you try to touch some paper and make your decision by feel. It’s a great, free resource you can download here make sure you get the 2017 revision. The Major Orchestra Librarians Association (MOLA) provides guidelines that not only suggest what should go on the page, but what you should use for the page, too. But you can go too heavy – card stock will also produce unfavorable reactions. It’s also less durable, can produce noisy page turns, and is more likely to be blown off the music stand when someone walks by or opens a door. When used for music, lightweight paper suggests that the contents are disposable, and its transparent nature is clearly unsuited for two-sided printing. Perhaps the most important element is the paper’s weight. When it comes to putting your music on paper, presentation plays a big part in perception, and it’s relatively easy to manage: your main paper variables are weight, color, and size. When musicians are given loose sheets of music, printed one-sided on translucent paper, they can’t help but think (consciously or not) that the music on it is similarly slapdash. If you take pride in the quality of your music notation, then print it on cheap typing paper, you’re dropping the ball a few feet from the goal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |